In 1891, James Ensor executed a work in oil paint, black pencil and charcoal on a mahogany wood panel entitled, Gilles and Sauvage. The painting's measurements are 12 x 16 cm. The painting is signed at the lower right and is titled and dated by the artist on the verso. (1) Because of the sparsely employed oil paint and the contours in pencil or charcoal of the silhouettes makes the work seem more like a enhanced drawing rather than an oil painting.
In Gilles and Sauvage, there are four figures depicted amongst whom are the main personages, Gilles and Sauvage. Who are these two protagonists? Are they imaginary figures or historical personages? There are three hypotheses that can be put forward. One approach was provided for this purpose in the note with the technical description of the work and through my collected oeuvre catalogue of Ensor's paintings. (2)
The two personages could be the French chroniclers Nicole Gilles (142?-1503) and Denis Sauvage (1520?-1587). Nicole Gilles was the treasurer of the French king Charles VIII and wrote Chronicle and Annals of France/Chronique et Annales de France, which probably was first published in 1525 in Paris. (3) Denis Sauvage was active during the reign of the French king Henry II as a historian, translator, philologist and author of the Chronicle of Flanders/Chronique de Flandre, which probably first appeared in 1561. Sauvage would have corrected the 1553 edition of Gilles' Chronicle and Annals of France/Chronique et Annales de France. (4)
The personages depicted by Ensor could be Pieter Gillis ('Gilles', 1486-1553) and Jean Le Sauvage ('Sauvage', ?-1518). The Antwerp Pieter Gillis-also known as Petrus Aegidius-was a humanist and friend of Erasmus and Thomas More. In 1517, he published Summa Sive Argentum Legum Imperatorum with the well-known printer Dirk Martens (5), in which he described Le Sauvage as 'a man of the peace'. During the same year, the Pauli Sententiæ Receptæ of Gillis also appeared. (6) He was also responsible for the publication of Thomas More's Utopia (1516). At the beginning of Utopia, Gillis, moreover, appears on the scene: he had a meeting at the foot of the Antwerp Cathedral with the fictitious world traveller, Rafaël Hythlodaeus, who was just back from Utopia. Gillis was also befriended by Quinten Metsys, who made a portrait of him (along with that of Erasmus) for Thomas More in 1517 as a token of their mutual friendship. (7) After a successful career as a member of the Council of Flanders and of the Chancellery of Brabant, Jean Le Sauvage was named as the first and only Fleming to the Chancellery of the Burgundian duke Charles, later Charles V. (8) Both Pieter Gillis and Jean Le Sauvage abided in humanitarian circles. That their relationship was trustworthy was witnessed in a letter from February 1517 from Gillis to Jean Sylvanius (Jean Le Sauvage), which was rendered on the verso of the title page of Pauli Sententiæ Receptæ. (9)
Gilles and Sauvage refer to figures from the late-Medieval folk theatre (cluyten), such as Valentin and Ourson, the 'wild man/savage'. These two personages are the subject of a drawing by Pieter Brueghel the Elder and of an anonymous print after Brueghel from 1566. The scene is found back in Brueghel's painting The Fight Between Carnival and Lent (1559, Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum). (10) Ensor often was inspired by Brueghel in content and stylistics, such as in the paintings, inter alia, The Sermon of St. Babylas (1892, current whereabouts unknown) and The Execution (1893, Hamburg, Kunsthalle, in long-term loan by Klaus Hegewisch). (11) In addition, the grotesque and carnavalesque figures from François Rabelais' Pantagruel and Gargantua could have inspired Ensor. In his many writings he sings the praises of Brueghel and Rabelais.
The question of why James Ensor painted this scene, however, remains unanswered. What were his sources? Did he receive information about 'Denis' and 'Sauvage' from third-party members? Who are the two other figures in the painting? The pesonage, furthest left in the composition, brings to mind the figure of an "Indian". The tableau appears to depict the folk figure "Gilles" and the "Noble Savage".
That the painter had an interest for historical and legendary subjects around 1890 is witnessed by various oil paintings on panel, such as The Remorse of the Ogre of Corsica (1890/1891, private collection), Auto-da-fé (or Philip II in Hell) (1891, private collection) and The Sermon of St. Babylas (1892, current whereabouts unknown), and prints such as Iston, Pouffamatus, Cracozie and Transmouff, Celebrated Persian Physicians, Examining the Stools of King Darius after the Battle of Arbela. (1886, Ghent, Museum of Fine Arts), Queen Parysatis (1899, Ghent, Museum of Fine Arts) and the Battle of the Golden Spurs (1895, Ghent, Museum of Fine Arts).
James Ensor owned an extensive and varied library, which he partially inherited from his father. He drew a great deal of inspiration from numerous literary, scientific and historical books.
Thanks to his friendship with, among others, Eugène Demolder, Théo Hannon and Ernest Rousseau, the artist could enlarge his intellectual horizon and expand his knowledge within the human sciences. It is not inconceivable that the realisation of Gilles and Sauvage was initiated during or after a conversation with one of the many intellectuals he had met in Brussels at the home of Ernest Rousseau, Rector of the Université Libre de Bruxelles (Free University of Brussels).
The painting, Gilles and Sauvage, is situated in the series of small oil paintings on panel that Ensor completed between 1890 and 1895. Just as with Mr. and Mrs. Rousseau Speaking with Sopie Yoteko of 1892 (private collection), it is about an 'enigmatic' painting. (12) It appears that during this period Ensor took pleasure in depicting cryptic subjects of which the meaning is not clear.